USPTO serial 78979719
ETIVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ETIVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | tweezers | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |