Drawing for INFUSED CIGARS

USPTO serial 78979742

INFUSED CIGARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFUSED CIGARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CigarsACTIVENov 30, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 6, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 26, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 17, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 17, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 31, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 14, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 11, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 19, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 8, 2009CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 8, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 31, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED
Sep 30, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED
Sep 29, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Aug 5, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 30, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Dec 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 5, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 4, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 4, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 3, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance