Drawing for INFUSED CIGARS

USPTO serial 78979742

INFUSED CIGARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFUSED CIGARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Goldschmidt, Jr.

John W. Goldschmidt, Jr. Dilworth Paxson LLP3200 Mellon Bank Center, 1735 Market St.Philadelphia, PA 19103-7595UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CigarsACTIVENov 30, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 6, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 26, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 31, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 14, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 19, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2009CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 8, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Sep 30, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Sep 29, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 30, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 5, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 4, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance