USPTO serial 78980002
MEDIACAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIACAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey P. Thennisch
JEFFREY P THENNISCH DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC29 W LAWRENCE ST STE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342-2183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Programs For Delivering And Displaying Audiovisual Content For Others, Database Management, Operating Systems, User Interfaces, Electronic Mail, Network Browsing, And Presentations, Namely, Video On Demand, Audiovisual Content On Demand, Music On Demand, And Text And Graphics On Demand In The Fields Of Business, Scientific, Technical, Commercial, Educational, And Personal Computing, And Instructional Manuals Distributed Therewith | ACTIVE | May 13, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |