USPTO serial 78980064
MICROFRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3443067Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROFRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Drzal
Rebecca Drzal Microban Products Company11400 Vanstory DriveHuntersville, NC 28078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | [ PILLOWS, WINDOW SHADES AND WINDOW BLINDS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 2008 |
| 024 | [ TOWELS; ] BEDDING GOODS, NAMELY, SHEETS, COMFORTERS, BED SPREADS, DUVET COVERS, BLANKETS, MATTRESS PADS AND COVERS [ ; TEXTILE SHOWER CURTAINS, THROWS, WINDOW CURTAINS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Microban Products Company
- Other trademarks owned by Microban Products Company
- Other trademarks owned by Microban Products Company
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named MICROFRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |