USPTO serial 78980083
SOUTH AFRICAN TOURISM WWW.SOUTHAFRICA.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUTH AFRICAN TOURISM WWW.SOUTHAFRICA.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chislehurston, Sandton, ZA
Chislehurston, Sandton, ZA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather, and leather and imitation leather goods, namely, bags, briefcases, wallets and purses, animal skins and hides, umbrellas and parasols; trunks and traveling bags, namely, backpacks, beach bags, knapsacks, hunter's game bags, cloth/material shopping bags, handbags, rucksacks, school satchels and bags, suitcases and vanity cases sold empty; wallets and purses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |