USPTO serial 78980459
CRYSTALAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3550314Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2008
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYSTALAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS LUCAS & MERCANTI30 BROAD STREET21 ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | [ SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF LASER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE ENGRAVING OF PLASTICS AND GLASS AND THREE DIMENSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF LASER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE ENGRAVING OF PLASTICS AND GLASS AND THREE DIMENSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PROJECTING AND DEVELOPING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; ] COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES [ ; CREATING COMPUTER SOFTWARE, PARTICULARLY IN CONNECTION WITH OPERATING LASERS; ENGINEERING SERVICES, PARTICULARLY IN THE SELECTION OF SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS AND CAMERA SYSTEMS PERTAINING TO LASER PROCESSING OF SURFACES AND INNER LASER ENGRAVING; PREPARING TECHNICAL EXPERT OPINIONS IN THE FIELDS OF LASER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE ENGRAVING OF PLASTICS AND GLASS AND THREE DIMENSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ] INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS; CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SELECTING COMPONENTS OF LASER SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |