USPTO serial 78980484
SOFT IMAGING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3503211Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2008
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOFT IMAGING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
MUNSTER, DE
Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
MUNSTER, DE
Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
MUNSTER, DE
Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
Planegg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF IMAGE PROCESSING, TOMOGRAPHY, SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, ENERGY FILTERED TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, DIGITAL ELECTRON DIFFRACTION PATTERN ANALYSIS; DESIGN SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF IMAGE PROCESSING, TOMOGRAPHY, SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, ENERGY FILTERED TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, DIGITAL ELECTRON DIFFRACTION PATTERN ANALYSIS; CREATING AND DEVELOPING COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR DATA PROCESSING, LEASING OF COMPUTERS, AND DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT AND CREATION OF EDP SYSTEMS AS WELL AS ELECTRIC AND/OR ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS FOR THIRD PARTIES; TECHNICAL CONSULTING AND EXPERTISE IN THE EDP FIELD, PERFORMING ANALYTIC EVALUATIONS FOR THIRD PARTIES; TECHNICAL CONSULTING AND EXPERTISE IN THE FIELD OF IMAGE PROCESSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS SOFT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS BIOSYSTEMS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOFT IMAGING SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |