USPTO serial 78980541
CALLERXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3514512Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CALLERXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westborough, MA
Westborough, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
Susan Neuberger Weller Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for mobile, land-based or global communications network data transmission, namely, transmission of personal or caller contact information between any combination of mobile, land-based or global communications network communications devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |