USPTO serial 78980964
DMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3607800Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
Lorrach, DE
Lorrach, DE
Lorrach, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin soap, perfume, essential body oils; products for the body and beauty care, namely, day care products in the nature of cream, lotion, spray, and gel, night care products in the nature of cream, lotion, and spray, body care products in the nature of lotion, cream, spray, and gel, barrier treatment products in the nature of cream and lotion, sensitive skin treatment products in the nature of cream, lotion, spray, and gel, peeling treatment products in the nature of gel, cream, and lotion, face care products in the nature of gel, cream, lotion, and spray, anti-wrinkle treatment products in the nature of cream, lotion, and gel, massage treatment products in the nature of lotion and cream, sun care products in the nature of lotion, gel, spray and cream, after and pre-shave treatment products in the nature of lotion, cream, spray, and gel, skin masks in the nature of cream and gel, deodorants in the nature of cream, lotion, and spray, skin cleanser in the nature of cream, lotions, and gel, baby skincare products in the nature of cream, lotion, gel, and spray, hand cream, hand lotions, eye contour treatment in the nature of cream, lotion, and gel, nail treatment in the nature of cream and lotion, moisturizing treatment in the nature of cream, lotion, spray, and gel, skin toners in the nature of gel, lotion, and solutions, scalp treatment in the nature of gel, lotion, and spray, hair care preparations and dentifrices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Kuhs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Kuhs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Kuhs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |