USPTO serial 78981009
(PRODUCT) RED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4234407Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2012
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with (PRODUCT) RED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
WASHINGTON, DC
WASHINGTON, DC
The Red Campaign Foundation, Inc.
Beverly Hills, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [computer software and firmware for operating system programs;] other types of wireless telecommunications equipment, namely, mobile phone battery travel chargers, mobile phone batteries; [earphones; desktop personal computers,] hand held computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 24, 2008 |
| 018 | Tote bags, book bags, purses, and other bags, namely, purses, shoulder bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 18, 2009 |
| 025 | fashion articles and accessories, namely, belts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2012 |
| 033 | [Wines;] alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 4, 2011 |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others through the use of distributing advertising materials; other services for charitable purposes, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the use of advertising and marketing campaigns for the purpose of promoting awareness about AIDS in Africa | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 3, 2010 |
| 036 | Fundraising for charitable purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 3, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE PERSUADERS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by THE ONE CAMPAIGN
- Other trademarks owned by THE ONE CAMPAIGN
- Other trademarks owned by The Red Campaign Foundation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE PERSUADERS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named (PRODUCT) RED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 30, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 10, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 4, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |