USPTO serial 78981018
CETAPHIL DAILYADVANCE ULTRA HYDRATING LOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3633330Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2009
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CETAPHIL DAILYADVANCE ULTRA HYDRATING LOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAUSANNE, CH
CH - 1000 Lausanne 30, CH
CH - 1000 Lausanne 30, CH
CH - 1000 Lausanne 30, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and skin care preparations, namely, face, hand and body soaps, cleansers and moisturizers; hair shampoos and conditioners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NESTLÉ SKIN HEALTH S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GALDERMA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GALDERMA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GALDERMA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CETAPHIL DAILYADVANCE ULTRA HYDRATING LOTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |