USPTO serial 78981306
ALSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3745624Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Rochman
Joan Rochman MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP11355 W. Olympic Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound recordings featuring series of musical sounds and musical video recordings featuring music and musical based entertainment; CD-Roms featuring music and music videos and entertainment information, namely, information about performances, recordings, appearances; downloadable musical sound recordings, downloadable musical videos and musical based entertainment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |