USPTO serial 78981340
RUMBLE IN THE JUNGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3982443Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2011
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUMBLE IN THE JUNGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berrien Springs, MI, US
Berrien Springs, MI, US
New York, NY, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable wallpaper, ringtones, and video games for mobile phones; mobile phone accessories, namely, face plates and cell phone covers; pre-recorded video cassettes, audio tapes, CDs and DVDs featuring or associated with athletes, celebrities and public figures; sunglasses; computer game software and online downloadable computer game programs; video game software; video game discs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1990 |
| 016 | Address books, photo albums, autograph books, paper bags, ball point pens, paper banners, blank note cards, poster boards, bulletin boards, children's books, coloring books, cook books, exercise books, picture books, series of fiction books featuring or associated with athletes, celebrities and public figures, series of non-fiction books featuring or associated with athletes, celebrities and public figures, calendars, gift cards, greeting cards, pen and pencil cases, daily planners, decals, paper party decorations, desk sets, diaries, erasers, file cards, gift wrapping paper, blank writing journals, magazines featuring or associated with athletes, celebrities and public figures; sheet music; newsletters featuring or associated with athletes, celebrities and public figures, desk pads, painting sets, writing paper, fountain pens, pencils, postcards, scrapbooks, posters, stationery, stickers, paper tape, trading cards and writing pads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named RUMBLE IN THE JUNGLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 27, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |