USPTO serial 78981365
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PROCEDA TECNOLOGIA E INFORMATICA S.A.
Sao Paulo, BR
Other trademarks owned by PROCEDA TECNOLOGIA E INFORMATICA S.A.
TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
MOGI DA CRUZES / SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
SAO PAULO, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
SAO PAULO, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
SAO PAULO, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services for structuring and optimization of the processes related to a corporative governance and business management, namely, in the information technology area; compilation and systemization of information in databanks; data research for third parties in computer files; data processing services; inventory management in the field of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; data transmission and reception services via telecommunications means; electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunications networks; telecommunications consultation; transmission of information by data communication for assisting decision making | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, technical training in the areas of information technology, computer sciences, communication through the global computer network, database compilation, computer network and data storage | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |