USPTO serial 78981380
TIVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2012
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TIVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
CEP 08773-490, MOGI DA CRUZES / SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
CEP 08773-490, MOGI DA CRUZES / SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
PROCEDA TECNOLOGIA E INFORMATICA S.A.
Sao Paulo, BR
Other trademarks owned by PROCEDA TECNOLOGIA E INFORMATICA S.A.
TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
SAO PAULO / SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
SAO PAULO, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair services of hardware for computers and maintenance of network and peripheral equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
- Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
- Other trademarks owned by PROCEDA TECNOLOGIA E INFORMATICA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TERCEIRIZACAO DE PROCESSOS SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIA S/A
- Other trademarks owned by TIVIT TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TIVIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |