USPTO serial 78981445
VALLE PERDIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4405066Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2013
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VALLE PERDIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buenos Aires, AR
Buenos Aires, AR
Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Graif
Galina Kirman CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasIP Dept - 25TH FloorNew York, NY 10112Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, bottled drinking water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fernando Carlos Muñoz de Toro
- Other trademarks owned by Fernando Carlos Muñoz de Toro
- Other trademarks owned by Fernando Carlos Muñoz de Toro
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named VALLE PERDIDO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |