Drawing for REDEL

USPTO serial 79000004

REDEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2995361Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 2005
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with REDEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Toms, Esq.

Keith Toms, Esq. McCarter & English, LLP265 FRANKLIN STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-3113United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC CONNECTORS; FIBER OPTIC CONNECTORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 26, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 31, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 16, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 16, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 12, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jul 26, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 30, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2008RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 21, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2003SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance