Drawing for MARTELL NOBLIGE

USPTO serial 79000024

MARTELL NOBLIGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARTELL NOBLIGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE ABELMAN

LAWRENCE ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, spirits and liqueurs made with wineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 17, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 16, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2005DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2003SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance