USPTO serial 79000072
CATRICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3006025Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CATRICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bora Creations S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Francisco Javier Gonzalez-Moreno
- Other trademarks owned by Bora Creations S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Bora Creations S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CATRICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |