USPTO serial 79000083
SERVOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3006026Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SERVOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie Anne Mastrovito
Marie Anne Mastrovito Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP888 7th Avenue, 38th FloorNew York, NY 10106United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing programs, in particular software for analyzing and improving processes in the industrial service business | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Managerial and organizational consultancy services for companies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultancy services for companies in the use of software for analyzing and improving processes in the industrial service business | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SERVOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |