Drawing for BINA

USPTO serial 79000090

BINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029all processed and preserved, dried and cooked vegetables as well as prepared meals (through sterilization and/or pasteurization processes), consisting primarily of potato products in the nature of ROESTI (a type of hash-browns), fried potatoes and potato gratin products; Furthermore for all sorts of jellies, jams and fruit saucesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Sauces, rice, tea, iced teaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, primarily for ready-to-drink tea products as well as for ready-to-drink fruit and vegetable drinks and fruit and vegetable juices as well as for other preparations for making beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 16, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 8, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance