Drawing for VIRTUAL AROMA SYNTHESIZER

USPTO serial 79000100

VIRTUAL AROMA SYNTHESIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3204123Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 30, 2007
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with VIRTUAL AROMA SYNTHESIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Instruments used for creating vaporized perfumesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 26, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 24, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 26, 2007FINAFINAL DISPOSITION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2006REINREINSTATED—
May 19, 2006IRGPIRREGULARITY ON GRANT OF PROTECTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 27, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance