USPTO serial 79000104
SUN MEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2959930Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUN MEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard Holtz
Leonard Holtz HOLTZ, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & CHICK PC16TH FLOOR220 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dental cement of resin; denture adhesives; fillings for teeth; composite resin for dental use namely, dental impression materials; dental prosthetic materials, namely, dental veneers, crowns, and bridges; sealing agents for dental purposes, namely, dental desensitizers and teeth protectors; other dental materials, namely, dental abrasives, dental polish, and dental rinse; diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use; biological tissue intended for subsequent implantation of bone, skin, and teeth | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUN MEDICAL KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SUN MEDICAL KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SUN MEDICAL KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SUN MEDICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |