Drawing for WILD GEESE RARE IRISH WHISKEY

USPTO serial 79000112

WILD GEESE RARE IRISH WHISKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD GEESE RARE IRISH WHISKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Bruce Prout

D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WHISKEY OF IRISH ORIGINABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 6, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 9, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 9, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 3, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 2005OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2005OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Nov 28, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2005NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 14, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance