Drawing for CHRISTIAN

USPTO serial 79000126

CHRISTIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3004528Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 4, 2005
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRISTIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair dyes; eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow pencils; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; lipsticks; cosmetics; cosmetic kits consisting of eyebrow pencils, lipsticks, make-up powder, mascara; nail enamel; cosmetic pencils; hair pomades; make-up powder; mascaraSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2026TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 4, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 24, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 24, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 24, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 18, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 5, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Jan 5, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 4, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 27, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 5, 2004CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance