Drawing for RYKIEL WOMAN NOT FOR MEN!

USPTO serial 79000156

RYKIEL WOMAN NOT FOR MEN!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3127015Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2006
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RYKIEL WOMAN NOT FOR MEN!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

MARY MARGARET L O'DONNELL RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eaux de toilette, deodorants for personal use, soaps, bath salts, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, including lipstick, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner pencils, lip liner pencils, eyebrow pencils, rouge, nail varnish, hair lotions not for medical use, dentrifrices, face creams, body creams, lotions, cleansing milks, beauty masks, depilatory creamsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 15, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 15, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 8, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 30, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance