Drawing for THERESA

USPTO serial 79000160

THERESA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERESA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcia A. Auberger

MARCIA A AUBERGER VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, blazers, jackets, shirts, blouses, scarves, t-shirts, sweatshirts, ladies' suits, pantsuits, coats, belts, pants, skirts, dresses, pullovers and cardigansSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 26, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance