Drawing for VALIO

USPTO serial 79000176

VALIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3095773Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2006
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff, Esq.

Mark I. Peroff, Esq. Hiscock & Barclay LLPSeven Times Square44th FloorNew York, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED, AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS, EGGS, MILK AND ] MILK BASED PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK, AND FROZEN YOGURT; [ EDIBLE OILS AND FATS ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2013INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2013DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 28, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 23, 2011INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 23, 2010A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2010AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Nov 19, 2010EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2010PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Nov 8, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2010ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2005LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 28, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2004LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance