Drawing for REDNET

USPTO serial 79000187

REDNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3008966Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 25, 2005
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd Braverman

Todd Braverman Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP1500 Broadway,12th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Infrared detectors for detecting the presence of people or movement; intruder detectors, namely, burglar alarms, security alarms, theft alarmsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2015RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Jul 6, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 6, 2015REINREINSTATED—
Jul 6, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 16, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 25, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 25, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 2, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jan 31, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance