Drawing for OPTALYS

USPTO serial 79000192

OPTALYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3011509Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2005
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OPTALYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clifford D. Hyra

Clifford D. Hyra Fresh IP PLC11710 Plaza America Drive Suite 2000Reston, VA 20190United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for industrial use , namely, rare earths based mixed oxides used as oxygen storage components in the manufacture of catalytic exhaust-gas converters for automotive emission controlACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 23, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 1, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 14, 2023CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 26, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 28, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2015PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Nov 25, 201515AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Nov 24, 2015NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 201515AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Nov 24, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 24, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 201515AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Oct 12, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2015E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 6, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 2, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 2, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Oct 13, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 10, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 1, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance