Drawing for DELATORI

USPTO serial 79000217

DELATORI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELATORI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys in general and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, jewellery, rings, earrings, bracelets, necklaces, not included in other classes; jewellery, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments (namely watches)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 6, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 21, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 8, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance