USPTO serial 79000232
QUANTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUANTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Boutell
DAVID G BOUTELL FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the diagnosis of medical conditions and for monitoring all kinds of medical therapy; computer software for bio-communication for use in the medical field, namely software for database management for use on human beings, animals and plants. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Electronic apparatus for the wireless transmission of vibrations and frequencies, namely a computer-system containing diodes with white noise scanning bio-fields and broadcasting generator-created therapy-plans to any target in the medical field as well as for the enhancement of the environment; medical apparatus for diagnosis and therapy, namely a random event generator linked to databases featuring wireless transmission of vibrations and frequencies for bio-communication, monitoring and information storage devices. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2022 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 23, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |