Drawing for VERITAS

USPTO serial 79000236

VERITAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3059161Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 14, 2006
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VERITAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Luepke

Marcus Luepke Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts for motor vehicle engines for the automotive industry, namely, [ feeders for fuel, air, ] coolants, [ oil, brake fluid ] and vacuums, supply lines and feeder systems comprised of pipes, tubes, [ couplings, seals, moldings, ] namely, [ brake pipes, fuel pipes, oil pipes, ] air pipes, [ supercharged air pipes, ] coolant pipes, vacuum pipes and water pipes comprised of metal, rubber and plastic composite materials, for supplying [ fuel air, ] coolants, [ and oil brake fluid, ] and pipes for intercoolers made of plastic and rubberACTIVE—
012[ parts for motor vehicles, namely, brakes and component parts used therefor, direction indicators, horn, gearbox, ] [ clutch, car body, seats, steering wheel, wheels, pneumatic tires, wheel rims, tire valves, shock absorbers, bumpers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017[ Rubber, gutta-percha or gum pipes, non-metal multi-layer pipes and pipes of rubber and plastic and of rubber/plastic composite materials composed primarily of rubber/plastic and having one component of metal for use in automotive applications in the automotive industry, namely, for supplying fuel, air, coolants, oil, brake fluid and vacuums; non-metal tubes and pipes couplings; seals and molding of rubber, rubber/plastic ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 202671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 8, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 20, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 16, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 19, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 201671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 8, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 18, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 29, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 23, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 15, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2004CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance