USPTO serial 79000294
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry; meat extracts; tinned, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies for food; jams; concentrates of beef and fish stock; edible oils and fats; compotes; cheeses and other dairy goods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; spreads containing grease; vine leaves in brine; French fries; crystallized fruits; processed crustaceans; preserved kitchen herbs; plant juice for cooking, tomato puree | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | processed cereal preparations and cereal flakes for human use, spices, mixtures of spices; bread, pastry; salt, vinegared sauces; honey; preserved ginger; chocolate, nutmeg; pies; ferments for pastes, namely, yeast; aromatic preparations for food, namely, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient of filler | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | agrarian, horticultural and forestry products for human consumption, namely, fresh roots for food, fresh chicory roots, flower bulbs, fresh garden herbs, leaves of the palm tree, fresh sesame seeds, fresh juniper berries; agricultural seeds, unprocessed edible seeds for human consumption; fresh fruits and vegetables, fresh pulses; seedlings; fresh nuts, fresh olives; animal feed, namely oil cake; fresh citrus fruits; fresh onions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2008 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |