USPTO serial 79000302
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EINDHOVEN, NL
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic, electrotechnical, electromechanical and electromagnetic modules, parts and components thereof, namely, integrated circuits (ICs), contactless multi-application chip cards containing programming for identification, to be used for logistic control, for identification, for automatic billing, for detecting counterfeit products, for access control and to open electronic locks, computer chips, and semiconductors, all for use in public transportation, identity, e-government, city loyalty and e-purse schemes; software, namely embedded operating software programs for use in contactless multi-application chip cards. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |