USPTO serial 79000311
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
rotex Textilhandel und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by rotex Textilhandel und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
rotex Textilhandel und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by rotex Textilhandel und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
rotex Textilhandel und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by rotex Textilhandel und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, blouses, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, cardigans, pullovers, jackets, robes, skirts, trousers, coats, overcoats, jogging shirts, jogging jackets, jogging pants, jogging shorts, underwear, swimsuits, bikinis, belts for clothing, headgear, namely, hats and caps, scarves, shawls, gloves and footwear | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |