Drawing for DER LACHS ORIGINAL DANZIGER GOLDWASSER LIQUEUR DANZIG GEGR. ANNO 1598 WED-LING WWE & EYDAM DIRCK HEKKER LIQUEUR DISTILLERY DER LACHS GERMANY

USPTO serial 79000403

DER LACHS ORIGINAL DANZIGER GOLDWASSER LIQUEUR DANZIG GEGR. ANNO 1598 WED-LING WWE & EYDAM DIRCK HEKKER LIQUEUR DISTILLERY DER LACHS GERMANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3068342Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2006
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DER LACHS ORIGINAL DANZIGER GOLDWASSER LIQUEUR DANZIG GEGR. ANNO 1598 WED-LING WWE & EYDAM DIRCK HEKKER LIQUEUR DISTILLERY DER LACHS GERMANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033LiqueursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 28, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 30, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 21, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 21, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 14, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Apr 13, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 8, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 16, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 3, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 3, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance