Drawing for ANNICK GOUTAL DUEL

USPTO serial 79000428

ANNICK GOUTAL DUEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3082908Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANNICK GOUTAL DUEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB10TH FL666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SOAPS, PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, COSMETIC HAIR LOTIONSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 19, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 12, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 12, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance