USPTO serial 79000438
HOTEL CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008969Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTEL CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
Laurel V. Dineff WWIPPS, Inc.160 North Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel booking agencies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |