USPTO serial 79000519
RAVELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3112142Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAVELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely man's shirts, blazers, blouses, blousons, body suits, boxer shorts, chemise, chemisettes, coats, dresses, fleece pullovers, golf shirts, jackets, jeans, knit shirts, leather coats, leather jackets, leggings, mantles, night shirts, trousers, underwear, sweat shirts, sweaters, pullovers, T-shirts, vests, gloves, polo shirts, bow ties, cravats, cummerbunds, neckties, neckwear, windshirts, socks, stockings; footwear, namely boots, shoes, sneakers; headgear, namely hats, head bands, caps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mintay Textil GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mintay Textil GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mintay Textil GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mintay Tekstil Konfeksiyon Sanayi A.S.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RAVELLI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |