Drawing for ENERGYCUBE POWERED BY B+W ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79000527

ENERGYCUBE POWERED BY B+W ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGYCUBE POWERED BY B+W ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
038TelecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating theretoSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 21, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 23, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 9, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance