Drawing for Serial No. 79000585

USPTO serial 79000585

Serial No. 79000585

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073669Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79000585?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Confectionery for medicinal purposes, namely, chewing gum, bubble gum, candy and mints, * all the afore-mentioned goods not specifically intended for dietetic purposes *SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Non-medicated confectionery, namely, chewing gum, bubble gum, candy and mintsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 12, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 12, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 29, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 6, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 2, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 13, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 10, 2012RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2011LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 16, 2011RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 4, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 4, 2009LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
May 14, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 8, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance