Drawing for XPLORY

USPTO serial 79000592

XPLORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3093336Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2006
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with XPLORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn E. Rzonca

Lynn E. Rzonca Ballard Spahr LLP1735 Market Street, 51st FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-7599United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Baby carriages; baby strollers; [ baby and ] children carriages [ and strollers featuring three wheels for sports use; ] shopping carts featuring children's seats and shopping bags; children's safety seats for vehicles; transport carriages, namely, transport trolleys, transport carts, prams, pushchairs, buggies, pushchairs featuring carrycot, strollers featuring carrycot, car seat carriersACTIVE—
018[ Wheeled bags, namely, all-purpose sport bags, all-purpose athletic bags, all-purpose carrying bags, shopping bags made of mesh, leather and/or textile material, travel bags, diaper bags all featuring wheels; ] shopping bags made of mesh, leather and/or textile materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Aug 27, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 8, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 2, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 2, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Sep 2, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 2, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 8, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 3, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 30, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 1, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance