USPTO serial 79000593
SOLU DYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLU DYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorders for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, data processing equipment, namely, computer software for administration | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training by classes, seminars and workshops in the field of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development and updating of computer software, databases and information pages for use by others on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |