Drawing for A ALTINBAS

USPTO serial 79000599

A ALTINBAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3021073Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A ALTINBAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony D. Logan

ANTHONY D LOGAN GRUP OFIS MARKA PATENT A.S.ATATURK BULVARI 211/11ANKARA, 06680TURKEY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys thereof; jewelry; precious stones; and horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 25, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 9, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 24, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 1, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 3, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 9, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance