Drawing for COOLFLUX DSP

USPTO serial 79000622

COOLFLUX DSP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2998370Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 20, 2005
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOLFLUX DSP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Apparatus and instruments for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or images; ] integrated circuits, computer chips, diodes, transistors, semiconductors and digital signal processors; computer software, namely, for use in power applications in portable audio encoding/decoding, sound enhancement, and noise suppressionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 10, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Sep 27, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED
Sep 27, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 27, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED
Sep 19, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 15, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 14, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 31, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 31, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance