USPTO serial 79000636
SYNCHROLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2963472Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2005
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SYNCHROLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick F. Clunk
Patrick F. Clunk Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Ave. Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Belts for machines, namely, driving belts, transmission belts, [ V-belts, ribbed V-belts, variable speed gear belts, ] synchronous belts, [ studded belts, twin-tooth synchronous drive belts, flat belts, conveying belts ] * all aforesaid goods exclusively used for doors and door-opening systems and not for lifts, cranes, moving staircases and other conveyors for persons and loads, as far as these do not concern door and door-opening systems * | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | [ Belts for land vehicles, namely, driving belts, transmission belts, [ V-belts, ] toothed belts ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ContiTech Antriebssysteme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ContiTech Antriebssysteme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ContiTech Antriebssysteme GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SYNCHROLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |