USPTO serial 79000666
TEAGIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3041834Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAGIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea, herbal tea for food purposes, iced tea, Japanese green tea, lime tea, Chinese tea, sage tea, tea substitutes, tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring, theme-free tea sweetened with sweeteners, fruit teas, beverages made of tea, tea for infusions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Riensch & Held (GmbH & Co.)
- Other trademarks owned by Riensch & Held (GmbH & Co.)
- Other trademarks owned by Riensch & Held (GmbH & Co.)
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TEAGIRL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |