USPTO serial 79000755
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ÜNIVERSAL TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
K. Cekmece ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by ÜNIVERSAL TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
ÜNIVERSAL TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
K. Cekmece ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by ÜNIVERSAL TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed blankets, bed linen, bed sheets, cloth labels, cotton fabric, fiberglass fabric for textile use, fitted toilet lid covers made of fabric or fabric substitutes, fustian, linen fabric, nylon fabric, pillow covers, polyester fabric, silk cloth, textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing, towels, velvet, vinyl place mats, woolen cloth, woolen fabric | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |