Drawing for PEPINO

USPTO serial 79000812

PEPINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3129962Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with PEPINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Liebowitz

Rebecca Liebowitz VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear, in particular baby-walking shoes, shoes for children, teens [, men and women ]; bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 21, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 6, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 24, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 22, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 22, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 27, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 27, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance